If you enjoy this web site, please show your support.

If you enjoy this web site, please show your support.

If you enjoy this web site, please show your support.

Author Topic: GMC  (Read 9687 times)

Rick Sousa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1490
GMC
« on: October 09, 2006, 11:27:33 AM »
                       

Hank's Truck Forum

GMC
« on: October 09, 2006, 11:27:33 AM »

charlie

  • Regular Membership
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33166
  • Wish i were built like a Mack truck
Re: GMC
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2006, 12:15:41 PM »
Love the first picture of the orange & yellow one. What was the long hood model called? Matlack ran them back in the day & they were awesome looking units with a tanker!

Rick Sousa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1490
Re: GMC
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2006, 12:21:03 PM »
They were 9500 series                             

                                                                                                                                   
« Last Edit: October 10, 2006, 11:03:34 AM by Hammer Time »

Gary Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6091
  • Fleet eye for the Chicken guy
Re: GMC
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2006, 01:38:41 PM »
They are rarely used, but GMC/Chevy trucks have a letter designation in the model number

The first picture is a J9500 (short hood)
The second picture is an M9500 (longn hood)
The General/Bison is the N-series.  The truck in the picture appears to be the 108" BBC version, the N9E.  The 116" version was the N9F.

AFAIK, the M series was never sold as a Chevy.

For reference, the other models were:
Astro/Titan: D9K (daycab), D9L (Sleeper)
Brigadier/Bruin: J9C or J8C (J8's were powered by mid-range diesels like the VT225 Cummins or 3208 Cat)
Top Kick/Kodiak: C7D or C8D
Low Cab Forward: W7N

The model designations were suffixed with either 042 or 064 (4x2 or 6x4), so, for example the General is a N9E042
It's a Mack thing. you wouldn't understand.....

"Every highway, just beyond the high beams"

Pete B.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
  • From - Lomira, Wi.
Re: GMC
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2006, 02:06:07 PM »
I love those GMCs like the top pic. I'll have to get a pic of the wrecker the junk yard just bought. What was the version like the top pic that had the 4 head light setup? I think they were 9500s also. I prefer the quad headlights more.
I'd Rather Be Driving A

charlie

  • Regular Membership
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33166
  • Wish i were built like a Mack truck
Re: GMC
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2006, 02:17:10 PM »
Mainly remember those long hood GMC's running around the east coast as daycabs; don't remember any fleet running sleepers. Was that more of an O/O option or did they even offer a sleeper?

EvanMcCausland

  • Guest
Re: GMC
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2006, 10:54:31 AM »
AFAIK, the M series was never sold as a Chevy.

For reference, the other models were:
Astro/Titan: D9K (daycab), D9L (Sleeper)
Brigadier/Bruin: J9C or J8C (J8's were powered by mid-range diesels like the VT225 Cummins or 3208 Cat)
Top Kick/Kodiak: C7D or C8D
Low Cab Forward: W7N

Just a few points...

-I think your M-series assumation is wrong.  I don't have a pic on hand at this time, but I'm pretty sure my '70 Chevy heavy conventional brochure shows a long-hood conventional hauling a gravel trailer.

-I need to check my Brig literature, as I believe the Series 8500 was also available with big-block gas power.

-W7N was only for the Class 7 Steel Tilt; I believe there was a Class 6 that was a W6.  This "W" name came into play relatively late in the Steel Tilt's life, and was carried into it's Isuzu-built replacement.

Gary Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6091
  • Fleet eye for the Chicken guy
Re: GMC
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2006, 01:15:31 PM »
Evan,

I could very well be wrong about the Chevy.  M's were not very common in these parts, regardless of badge.  I'll qualify my remark by saying that I never saw one as a Chevy.

Yes, the J8 Brig also offered gas power.

Agreed on the W-series, however, I usually restrict my discussions on this forum to class 7 or 8 trucks.

My source is the Nov/Dec 1978 issue of Owner/Operator, which was the 1979 specs issue.  W's were listed as offering only gas power, IIRC the 6V53 was offered at one time.  Unfortunately, '77 is the oldest specs issue that I have and includes the General/Bison, so I don't have any further info on the M.

I miss those "specs" issues.  I eagerly awaited each year's issue.  The last one I have was from '89.

To pose a question, wasn't the Astro/Titan also offered in a short-sleeper version, i.e. 72-75" BBC?  I seem to recall seeing photos of one.
« Last Edit: October 10, 2006, 01:17:48 PM by Gary Smith »
It's a Mack thing. you wouldn't understand.....

"Every highway, just beyond the high beams"

doug mckenzie

  • Regular Membership
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2853
  • Doug McKenzie
Re: GMC
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2006, 01:59:00 PM »

Gary, the Astro/Titan was offered with a 72-inch sleeper.

I have a slide of one from one of the casket manufacturers, I think perhaps Hillenbrand, who came up to Ontario here pulling doubles.

The long nose 9500, or M as you refer to it, was offered and sold as a Chevy.
They were quite popular in Maritime Canada - remember seeing both on several occasions.

The M Series long nose 9500 was seldom seen with a box sleeper and I don't think ever sold out of the factory with one. My literature from that time doesn't show any or mention it.

Mackie Van and Storage, now Mackie Moving Corporation, purchased a used long nose MH-9500 (8V-71 Detroit) from Carling O'Keefe Breweries and puit a sleeper on it.

Carling O'Keefe ran a whole fleet of MH-9500's in the 70's - they were all red, bare bones, no chrome - the dual exhaust pipes were even painted black.
Right-wing Old School.

Gary Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6091
  • Fleet eye for the Chicken guy
Re: GMC
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2006, 03:07:47 PM »
Gary, the Astro/Titan was offered with a 72-inch sleeper.

I have a slide of one from one of the casket manufacturers, I think perhaps Hillenbrand, who came up to Ontario here pulling doubles.

The long nose 9500, or M as you refer to it, was offered and sold as a Chevy.
They were quite popular in Maritime Canada - remember seeing both on several occasions.

The M Series long nose 9500 was seldom seen with a box sleeper and I don't think ever sold out of the factory with one. My literature from that time doesn't show any or mention it.

Mackie Van and Storage, now Mackie Moving Corporation, purchased a used long nose MH-9500 (8V-71 Detroit) from Carling O'Keefe Breweries and puit a sleeper on it.

Carling O'Keefe ran a whole fleet of MH-9500's in the 70's - they were all red, bare bones, no chrome - the dual exhaust pipes were even painted black.

I think that steel hauler Yourga had some short sleeper Astros, now that I think about it.

Most of the M's I saw around here were owner-operator rigs, altho Roadway had one set up as a wrecker at the Hagerstown, MD breakbulk terminal.  It must have been a test tractor at one time, I don't ever remember seeing one as a tractor.
It's a Mack thing. you wouldn't understand.....

"Every highway, just beyond the high beams"

Paul Kane

  • Regular Membership
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9797
Re: GMC
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2006, 03:11:18 PM »
Quote
Gary, the Astro/Titan was offered with a 72-inch sleeper

Womeldorf out of DuBois, Pa., and Yourga, a steel hauler out of Wheatland, are two big users that come to mind.

Paul Kane

  • Regular Membership
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9797
Re: GMC
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2006, 03:13:37 PM »
Quote
I think that steel hauler Yourga had some short sleeper Astros, now that I think about it.

You trumped me!

Steve Slocum

  • Guest
Re: GMC
« Reply #12 on: October 11, 2006, 02:52:29 AM »
I was up at my garage yesterday working on a few things when I heard a Detroit coming up the hill. It turned , and went down behind my property where they were chopping corn in the big field.
 Just happened to have a camera with me, so got a picture as it came back up the lane.
 I've seen this General around a lot, and it's a ratty looking SOB, but it sure sounds nice.
[/img]

Rob Archer

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19562
  • Forum Administrator
    • www.hankstruckpictures.com
Re: GMC
« Reply #13 on: October 11, 2006, 04:16:43 AM »


Carling O'Keefe ran a whole fleet of MH-9500's in the 70's - they were all red, bare bones, no chrome - the dual exhaust pipes were even painted black.

Hi Doug: Don't forget the M's that Consolidated Truck Lines ran. They survived into the Dominion Consolidated era and were even used as local tractors. I had a client in St.Catharines who received bolts of cloth from overseas. I remember DomCon sending a long nose 9500 to pick some up and take down to St.Kitts. I don't remember the client's name just how mad Gord Aldridge (Aldridge Cargo Services) was when he found out I was using DomCon (Truck-Air Ltd. Authority) because they were cheaper.


EvanMcCausland

  • Guest
Re: GMC
« Reply #14 on: October 11, 2006, 05:25:30 AM »
Agreed on the W-series, however, I usually restrict my discussions on this forum to class 7 or 8 trucks.

Understood, but seeing as the 72"BBC steel tilt cab was used on everything from class 6 to class 8 - with class 8 being essentially replaced by the Astro in '69 - it's important to note.

I think I've got the original GM T&C cab blueprints from '57 somewhere downstairs.  I'll have to see if I can't photograph it; it's a huge thing.

Hank's Truck Forum

Re: GMC
« Reply #14 on: October 11, 2006, 05:25:30 AM »

If you enjoy this web site, please show your support.